1. Savas & Hamberg In-vitro Evaluation of the Anntimicrobial effect of a new silver-containing wound contact layer in Combination with Secondary Dressings. Presented at SAWC Spring 2015. 2. Davies P., Rippon M. Evidence review: the clinical benefits of Safetac technology in wound care. MA Healthcare Ltd, London, 2008. 3. White R. et al. Evidence for atraumatic soft silicone wound dressing use. Wounds UK, 2005. 4. Dykes P.J. et al. Effects of adhesive dressing on the corneum of the skin. Journal of Wound Care, 2001. 5. Waring P. et al. An evaluation of the skin stripping of wound dressing adhesives. Journal of Wound Care, 2011. 6. Wiberg A.B. et al. Preventing Maceration with a soft silicone dressing: In-vitro Evaluations. Poster, WUWHS, Toronto, Canada, 2008. 7. Meaume S. et al. A study to compare a new self-adherent soft silicone dressing with a self-adherent polymer dressing in stage II pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Management, 2003. 8. White R. A multinational survey of the assessment of pain when removing dressings. Wounds UK, 2008. 9. Rippon M. et al. Taking the trauma out of wound care: the importance of undisturbed healing. Journal of Wound Care, 2012. 10. Barrett S. Mepitel® One: a wound contact layer with Safetac® technology. British Journal of Nursing 2012 11. Davis S.C. et al. A closer examination of atraumatic dressings for optimal healing. IWJ, 2013. 12. Savas & Hamberg Antimicrobial effect of a new silver-containing wound contact layer against common wound pathogens in vitro. Presented at SAWC Spring 2015. 13. Upton D. et al. The impact of atraumatic vs conventional dressings on pain and stress. Journal of Wound Care, 2012.